Sources: 1 and 3-8: Kate Bronfenbrenner, Uneasy Terrain: The Impact of Capital Mobility on Workers, Wages and Union Organizing, September 6, 2000. A more recent study of Chicago area NLRB representation elections by University of Illinois-Chicago professors Chirag Mehta and Nik Theodore reported similar findings. Mehta and Theodore found that workers were fired illegally during 30 percent of organizing campaigns, employers force workers to attend one-on-one anti-union meetings with supervisors during 91 percent of NLRB representation election campaigns, and employers hire consultants or union-busters to help them fight 82 percent of union organizing drives. See Mehta and Theodore, “Undermining the Right to Organize: Employer Behavior During Union Representation Campaigns,” report for American Rights at Work, December 2005. 2. John Schmitt and Ben Zipperer, "Dropping the Ax: Illegal Firings During Union Election Campaigns," Center for Economic Policy Research report, January 2007, http://www.cepr.net/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=775&Itemid=8 9. National Labor Relations Board annual report, fiscal year 2005, Table 4. 10. Kate Bronfenbrenner, "Uneasy Terrain: The Impact of Capital Mobility on Workers, Wages and Union Organizing, Part II: First Contract Supplement," 2001. According to more recent data reported by the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service, an even higher proportion of unions newly certified pursuant to the NLRB representation process are denied first contracts by employers: 45 percent (Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service annual report, 2004). 11-12: Peter D. Hart Research Associates, survey for the AFL-CIO, December 2006. 13. AFL-CIO calculation based on Peter D. Hart Research Associates survey, December 2006. 14. U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. |